Detoxification is a crucial process in the human body that involves the elimination of harmful substances, such as toxins and xenobiotics, to maintain homeostasis and protect against disease. Glycoimmunology, the study of the interactions between glycans and the immune system, has emerged as a field that explores the role of glycosylation in various biological processes, including detoxification.
Glycoimmunology plays a significant role in detoxification processes in humans. Glycosylation, mediated by enzymes such as UGTs, is an essential mechanism for the elimination of toxins from the body. The human glycome and its interactions with the immune system have been shown to influence various cellular processes, including those involved in HIV infection. Furthermore, genetic variations in detoxification system genes can impact an individual's susceptibility to respiratory diseases and allergies, as well as their ability to metabolize and eliminate toxic agents. Understanding the role of glycoimmunology in detoxification can provide insights into the development of therapeutic strategies and personalized medicine approaches.
The Role of Mannose Metabolism in Detoxification in Humans
Mannose is a monosaccharide that plays a crucial role in various biological processes, including detoxification. Mannose metabolism involves the conversion of mannose into mannose-6-phosphate, which is further metabolized to produce energy or used for the synthesis of glycoproteins and glycolipids (Sharma et al., 2014). Recent studies have shed light on the significance of mannose metabolism in detoxification processes, highlighting its potential therapeutic applications (Sharma et al., 2014; Sharma et al., 2018).
Detoxification and Mannose Metabolism
Mannose metabolism has been found to be involved in the detoxification of various substances in humans. For instance, in a study using a mouse model of diet-induced obesity, mannose supplementation was shown to prevent weight gain, reduce liver steatosis, and improve glucose tolerance (Sharma et al., 2018). These findings suggest that mannose metabolism plays a role in the detoxification of dietary fats and their detrimental effects on metabolic health.
Furthermore, mannose metabolism has been implicated in the detoxification of heavy metals. In Arabidopsis plants, mannose triggers a signaling cascade that leads to the synthesis of glutathione, a key molecule involved in the detoxification of cadmium (Yan et al., 2021). Similarly, in humans, mannose metabolism has been associated with the regulation of hepatic stellate cell activation and fibrosis, which are processes involved in the detoxification of harmful substances in the liver (DeRossi et al., 2019).
Therapeutic Applications
The therapeutic potential of mannose metabolism in detoxification has been explored in various studies. Mannose supplementation has been shown to prevent diet-induced obesity and improve metabolic health in animal models (Sharma et al., 2018). These findings suggest that targeting mannose metabolism could be a potential strategy for the treatment of obesity-related metabolic disorders in humans.
In conclusion, mannose metabolism plays a crucial role in detoxification processes in humans. It is involved in the detoxification of dietary fats, heavy metals, and potentially other harmful substances. Understanding the mechanisms underlying mannose metabolism and its role in detoxification could lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for metabolic disorders and cancer. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the complex interplay between mannose metabolism and detoxification processes in humans.
The Detoxification Function of Lysosomes
Lysosomes are the garbage disposal units of our cells, roaming around digesting cellular waste with their specialized enzymes and recycling excess or worn-out cell parts. Additionally, they may also be used to destroy invading viruses and bacteria.
The lysosome is a cellular organelle that has long been recognized for its role in the degradation and recycling of cellular waste (Settembre et al., 2013). However, recent research has revealed that lysosomes have a much broader range of functions, including their involvement in detoxification processes (Dielschneider et al., 2017). Lysosomes act as sites of macromolecule degradation and nutrient recycling, supporting diverse cellular functions (Ferguson, 2019). They also play a crucial role in processes that control cellular and organismal life and death (Carmona-Gutiérrez et al., 2016).
One aspect of lysosomal function in detoxification is their ability to sequester and remove heavy metals from the cell. Lysosomes are known to play a role in sequestration and detoxification of heavy metals such as copper, zinc, cadmium, and mercury (Wu et al., 2013). They act as a storage site for these metals, preventing their accumulation and potential toxicity in other cellular compartments (Wu et al., 2013). Additionally, lysosomes have been implicated in the detoxification of platinum-based chemotherapeutic drugs, such as cisplatin (Guerra et al., 2019). While it was initially hypothesized that lysosomes serve as a detoxification pathway for cisplatin, it has also been suggested that sequestration of cisplatin into lysosomes may induce lysosomal damage and apoptosis (Guerra et al., 2019).
Furthermore, lysosomes are involved in the processing and detoxification of exogenous substances. For example, proteasomes and lysosomes, the two main proteolytic centers in cells, play a role in the turnover and detoxification of toxic human amylin in pancreatic cells (Singh et al., 2016). The proteasome and lysosome work together to degrade and eliminate toxic proteins, ensuring cellular homeostasis.
The detoxification function of lysosomes is closely linked to their acidification mechanisms. Lysosomes maintain an acidic pH through the activity of a proton-pumping V-type ATPase, which uses ATP to pump protons into the lysosome lumen (Mindell, 2012). This acidic environment is essential for the proper functioning of lysosomal enzymes involved in the degradation and detoxification processes.
In summary, lysosomes play a crucial role in cellular detoxification processes. They sequester and remove heavy metals, participate in the processing and detoxification of exogenous substances, and maintain an acidic environment necessary for the activity of lysosomal enzymes. Understanding the role of lysosomes in detoxification is important for elucidating cellular clearance mechanisms and developing therapeutic strategies for diseases involving impaired lysosomal function.
Mannose Metabolism and the Lysosome in Detoxification
The role of mannose metabolism and the lysosome in detoxification is a complex process that involves various cellular components and pathways. One important aspect is the recognition and targeting of lysosomal enzymes to the lysosome. Mannose-6-phosphate receptors (MPRs) play a critical role in this process by sorting lysosomal enzymes from secretory proteins and delivering them to the lysosomes (Das et al., 2016). In mammalian cells, MPRs recognize lysosomal proteins carrying a mannose-6-phosphate moiety in the trans-Golgi network and transport them to the endosome (Babst, 1997). This pathway is conserved in higher eukaryotes and is essential for lysosome biogenesis and cellular homeostasis (Waguri et al., 2003).
Once the lysosomal enzymes are delivered to the lysosome, they participate in the detoxification process. Lysosomes are the hydrolytic compartments of cells and are responsible for the degradation and recycling of macromolecules (Boutouja et al., 2019). They contain various enzymes, including acid phosphatases and aspartic acid endopeptidases, which are involved in the breakdown of toxic substances (Zhu et al., 2011). The activity of lysosomal enzymes is regulated by the presence of mannose 6-phosphate tags, which are recognized by MPRs (Bohnsack et al., 2009). The cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CI-MPR) and the cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CD-MPR) are responsible for delivering mannose 6-phosphate-tagged lysosomal enzymes to the endosomal/lysosomal system (Bohnsack et al., 2009).
In crustaceans, metal sequestration and detoxification involve the individual roles of hepatopancreatic mitochondria, lysosomes, and endoplasmic reticula (Ahearn et al., 2004). These organelles contribute to the inactivation and transport of heavy metals, ensuring their sequestration and detoxification within the organism (Ahearn et al., 2004). Similarly, in alveolar macrophages, lysosomes play a crucial role in metal detoxification (Berry et al., 1997). The lysosomes contain acid phosphatases that are involved in the breakdown of metals, contributing to their detoxification (Berry et al., 1997).
In summary, the role of mannose metabolism and the lysosome in detoxification involves the recognition and targeting of lysosomal enzymes to the lysosome through mannose-6-phosphate receptors. Once delivered to the lysosome, these enzymes participate in the breakdown and detoxification of toxic substances. The process is conserved in higher eukaryotes and involves various cellular components, including the trans-Golgi network, endosomes, and lysosomes. Additionally, in crustaceans and alveolar macrophages, lysosomes contribute to the sequestration and detoxification of heavy metals.
The Role of Mannose and Autophagy in Detoxification
Detoxification is a crucial process for maintaining cellular homeostasis and protecting against various harmful substances. Mannose and autophagy have been identified as important players in detoxification mechanisms.
Mannose, a hexose sugar, has been found to play a key role in detoxification processes. In a recent study it was observed that the addition of mannose facilitated further detoxification through conjugation (Küpper et al., 2018). This suggests that O-glycosyl transferase (GT) plays a crucial role in the detoxification process. Additionally, in a recent study the protective effects of catalpol against triptolide-induced hepatotoxicity were attributed to the inhibition of excessive autophagy via the PERK-ATF4-CHOP pathway (Zhang et al., 2022). This indicates that autophagy can be regulated to prevent harmful effects and promote detoxification.
Autophagy, a cellular process involved in the degradation and recycling of cellular components, has also been implicated in detoxification mechanisms. Autophagy has been shown to be a fallback repair mechanism for cells that have suffered major reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage (Song et al., 2017). When cells are unable to restore damage through proteasomal degradation or detoxification pathways alone, autophagy can help remove damaged components and promote cell survival. Furthermore, autophagy has been identified as an important mechanism for copper (Cu) and platinum (Pt) detoxification (Mariniello et al., 2020). It has been suggested that autophagy plays a role in the resistance of tumor cells to cisplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapy drug.
In conclusion, both mannose and autophagy play important roles in detoxification processes. Mannose facilitates further detoxification through conjugation, while autophagy acts as a fallback repair mechanism for cells that have suffered major damage. Understanding the mechanisms and regulation of mannose and autophagy in detoxification can provide insights into potential therapeutic strategies for various diseases and conditions associated with toxin exposure.
The Role of the Proteasome and Mannose in Detoxification
The role of the proteasome and mannose in detoxification in humans is a complex and multifaceted process. The proteasome, a large protein complex responsible for degrading damaged or misfolded proteins, plays a crucial role in cellular detoxification (Singh et al., 2016). It regulates the turnover of toxic substances, such as amylin, in pancreatic cells (Singh et al., 2016). This process is important for maintaining cellular homeostasis and preventing the accumulation of toxic substances.
In addition to its role in protein degradation, the proteasome is also involved in the stability of various proteins, including tumor suppressors like p53 (Asher et al., 2006). It acts as a 20S proteasome-associated protein and plays a role in the detoxification of quinones (Asher et al., 2006). This highlights the diverse functions of the proteasome in cellular detoxification processes.
Mannose, a type of sugar, is also involved in detoxification processes in humans. It has been shown to play a role in the detoxification of methylglyoxal (MG) during self-incompatibility response in plants (Sankaranarayanan et al., 2017). Accumulation of glyoxalase, an enzyme involved in MG detoxification, leads to efficient pollination (Sankaranarayanan et al., 2017). This suggests that mannose may have a similar role in the detoxification of MG in humans.
Furthermore, the transcription factor Nrf2 has been implicated in cellular detoxification responses (Karimi-Moghadam et al., 2018). It serves as a master regulator of cellular antioxidant functions and detoxification responses (Karimi-Moghadam et al., 2018). Nrf2 controls the expression of phase II detoxification genes, which are involved in the metabolism and elimination of toxic substances (Rangasamy et al., 2009). This highlights the importance of transcriptional regulation in detoxification processes.
Overall, the proteasome and mannose play important roles in detoxification processes in humans. The proteasome is involved in the turnover and degradation of toxic substances, while mannose may be involved in the detoxification of specific compounds. Transcriptional regulation, mediated by factors like Nrf2, is also crucial for coordinating detoxification responses. Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms underlying these processes and their implications for human health.
The Role of Glycoimmunology in NRF2 Activation and Detoxification
Glycoimmunology is a field that investigates the interactions between glycans and the immune system. Glycans, complex sugar molecules, play important roles in various biological processes, including immune responses. NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of genes involved in antioxidant and detoxification pathways. This paper aims to discuss the role of glycoimmunology in relation to NRF2 activation and its impact on detoxification processes.
Detoxification and NRF2 Activation
NRF2 activation promotes the transcription of genes encoding detoxification enzymes and antioxidant proteins (DeNicola et al., 2011). These enzymes are crucial for the detoxification of various chemicals, protecting cells from oxidative stress, and maintaining cellular homeostasis (Cuadrado et al., 2019). NRF2-regulated enzymes provide a protective mechanism against environmental factors that can contribute to autoimmune pathogenesis (Cuadrado et al., 2019). When exposed to stressors, NRF2 is stabilized and translocates into the nucleus, where it activates the transcription of detoxification and antioxidant enzyme genes (Taguchi et al., 2011). This activation of NRF2 leads to an increased expression of genes involved in oxidative stress response and drug detoxification (Kim et al., 2022).
Glycoimmunology and Detoxification
Glycans have been shown to modulate immune responses and play a role in various diseases, including cancer. In the context of detoxification, glycoimmunology can influence the activation of NRF2 and its downstream targets. For example, glycan modifications of proteins involved in the NRF2 pathway can affect their stability and activity, thereby influencing detoxification processes (Taguchi et al., 2011). Additionally, glycosylation patterns on cell surface receptors can impact the recognition and clearance of toxins by immune cells, further contributing to detoxification mechanisms (Taguchi et al., 2011).
In conclusion, Glycoimmunology and NRF2 activation are interconnected in detoxification processes. Glycans can modulate the activation and function of NRF2 and its downstream targets, influencing the detoxification capabilities of cells. Understanding the interplay between glycoimmunology and NRF2 activation can provide insights into the development of therapeutic strategies targeting detoxification pathways in various diseases.
The Role of the Lysosome with NRF2 Activation in Detoxification
Mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) glycan is a crucial signal for the trafficking of lysosomal enzymes to lysosomes.
The lysosome plays a crucial role in the activation of Nrf2 and its involvement in detoxification processes.
Additionally, Nrf2 activation leads to the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase and heme oxygenase-1, which help to neutralize reactive oxygen species (ROS) and protect cells from oxidative damage (Okazaki et al., 2020; Afzal et al., 2022).
The lysosome, a membrane-bound organelle involved in intracellular degradation and recycling processes, has been implicated in Nrf2 activation and detoxification. It has been observed that Nrf2 largely accumulates in the nucleus of colonic cells when delivered using nanocomposites, indicating that it can escape from lysosomes and activate the Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway (Zeng et al., 2023). This suggests that the lysosome may play a role in regulating the subcellular localization and activation of Nrf2.
In conclusion, the lysosome plays a crucial role in the activation of Nrf2 and its involvement in detoxification processes. Nrf2 activation leads to the transcriptional upregulation of detoxification enzymes and antioxidant genes, which contribute to the cellular defense against oxidative and electrophilic stresses. Understanding the role of the lysosome in Nrf2 activation and detoxification processes may provide insights into the development of therapeutic strategies for diseases associated with oxidative stress and impaired detoxification.
The Role of Glycoimmunology and CFTR with Glutathione for Detoxification
Detoxification is a crucial process in maintaining cellular homeostasis and protecting against harmful substances. Glutathione, a tripeptide composed of glutamate, cysteine, and glycine, plays a vital role in cellular detoxification by conjugating with xenobiotics and facilitating their elimination. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, along with other ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, is involved in the transport of glutathione conjugates and contributes to the detoxification process (Wioland et al., 2000; Xi et al., 2017; Sermet-Gaudelus et al., 1999).
CFTR and Glutathione Detoxification
CFTR, a member of the ABC transporter superfamily, is primarily known for its role in chloride ion transport. However, recent studies have revealed its involvement in glutathione conjugate transport and cellular detoxification (Wioland et al., 2000). CFTR, along with multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) and multidrug resistance protein 3 (MDR1), is responsible for the export of glutathione conjugates, thereby facilitating their elimination from cells (Wioland et al., 2000; Xi et al., 2017; Sermet-Gaudelus et al., 1999). This function of CFTR is particularly important in cystic fibrosis (CF), a genetic disorder characterized by defective CFTR function (Xi et al., 2017; Nicolis et al., 2006).
Glycoimmunology and Glutathione Detoxification
Glycoimmunology, the study of the interactions between glycans and the immune system, has also been implicated in cellular detoxification processes. Glycans, including glycoproteins and glycolipids, play a crucial role in modulating immune responses and cellular signaling pathways (Schmitz & Langmann, 2008). Recent research has shown that glycosylation patterns can influence the expression and function of ABC transporters involved in glutathione conjugate transport (Schmitz & Langmann, 2008). This suggests that glycoimmunology may have a regulatory role in the detoxification process mediated by CFTR and other ABC transporters.
CFTR and Glutathione Homeostasis
CFTR dysfunction in CF patients leads to altered glutathione homeostasis, which can contribute to oxidative stress and inflammation (Patergnani et al., 2020). Studies have shown that CFTR-knockout cells exhibit reduced levels of mitochondrial reduced glutathione (mtGSH) and defects in GSH transport (Patergnani et al., 2020). This disruption in glutathione homeostasis can result in an altered extracellular ratio between reduced and oxidized glutathione, further exacerbating the oxidative stress and inflammation observed in CF (Patergnani et al., 2020).
In conclusion, the role of glycoimmunology and CFTR in glutathione-mediated detoxification processes is becoming increasingly evident. CFTR, along with other ABC transporters, plays a crucial role in the export of glutathione conjugates, contributing to cellular detoxification (Wioland et al., 2000; Xi et al., 2017; Sermet-Gaudelus et al., 1999). Furthermore, glycosylation patterns may influence the expression and function of these transporters, highlighting the potential regulatory role of glycoimmunology in detoxification processes (Schmitz & Langmann, 2008). Understanding the interplay between glycoimmunology, CFTR, and glutathione detoxification may provide insights into the pathogenesis of diseases such as CF and contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
The Role of Glycoimmunology, Mannose, Clathrin, CFTR with Glutathione for Detoxification
Detoxification is a crucial process in living organisms to eliminate harmful xenobiotic compounds and maintain cellular homeostasis. Glycoimmunology, mannose, clathrin, CFTR, and glutathione are all involved in various aspects of detoxification processes. This paper aims to explore the role of these factors in detoxification and their interplay in cellular defense mechanisms.
Role of Glycoimmunology in Detoxification
Glycoimmunology refers to the study of glycan structures and their interactions with the immune system. Glycans play a vital role in cellular recognition, signaling, and immune responses (Li et al., 2007). In the context of detoxification, glycoimmunology is involved in the recognition and clearance of xenobiotic compounds. Glycan structures on cell surfaces can interact with xenobiotics, facilitating their uptake and subsequent detoxification processes (Li et al., 2007). This interaction between glycans and xenobiotics is mediated by various glycan-binding proteins, such as lectins, which recognize specific glycan patterns on the surface of cells (Li et al., 2007). These interactions can trigger immune responses and activate detoxification pathways to eliminate xenobiotics from the body.
Mannose and Clathrin in Detoxification
Mannose is a monosaccharide that plays a crucial role in glycosylation processes and cellular recognition. It is involved in the synthesis of glycoproteins and glycolipids, which are essential for cell-cell communication and immune responses (Li et al., 2007). Mannose-binding lectins (MBLs) are a group of proteins that recognize mannose residues on glycan structures and play a role in innate immunity (Li et al., 2007). MBLs can bind to xenobiotics and facilitate their clearance through various detoxification pathways (Li et al., 2007).
Clathrin is a protein involved in endocytosis, a process by which cells internalize extracellular substances, including xenobiotics (Li et al., 2007). Clathrin-coated vesicles are responsible for the internalization of various molecules, including glycoproteins and glycolipids (Li et al., 2007). This process can contribute to the detoxification of xenobiotics by sequestering them into intracellular compartments for further processing and elimination (Li et al., 2007).
CFTR and Glutathione in Detoxification
CFTR (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator) is an ion channel protein primarily associated with cystic fibrosis. However, recent studies have shown its involvement in detoxification processes (Li et al., 2007). CFTR is expressed in various tissues, including the liver and lungs, where it plays a role in the transport of glutathione, a key molecule in detoxification (Li et al., 2007). Glutathione is a tripeptide composed of glutamate, cysteine, and glycine, and it acts as a major antioxidant and detoxification agent in cells (Li et al., 2007). CFTR-mediated transport of glutathione is essential for maintaining cellular redox balance and protecting against oxidative stress (Li et al., 2007).
Glutathione conjugation is a major detoxification pathway in which xenobiotics are conjugated with glutathione to form more water-soluble compounds that can be easily eliminated from the body (Marrs, 1996). Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of enzymes that catalyze this conjugation reaction (Marrs, 1996). GSTs play a crucial role in the detoxification of a wide range of xenobiotics, including drugs, pesticides, and environmental pollutants (Marrs, 1996). They are highly expressed in various tissues, including the liver, where they contribute to the elimination of toxic compounds (Marrs, 1996).
In conclusion, Glycoimmunology, Mannose, Clathrin, CFTR, and Glutathione all play important roles in detoxification processes. Glycoimmunology and Mannose are involved in the recognition and clearance of xenobiotics, while clathrin facilitates their internalization into cells. CFTR-mediated transport of glutathione and the activity of GSTs contribute to the conjugation and elimination of xenobiotics. Understanding the interplay between these factors is crucial for developing strategies to enhance detoxification processes and protect against the harmful effects of xenobiotics.
The Role of Glucuronosyltransferases and the Gut Microbiota in Detoxification
Detoxification is a crucial process in the body that involves the metabolism and elimination of various endobiotics and xenobiotics. Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) play a significant role in this process by catalyzing the glucuronidation of compounds, converting them into hydrophilic glucuronides that can be excreted (Yang et al., 2017). UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are a superfamily of enzymes that are responsible for the glucuronidation process (Rowland et al., 2013). They are membrane-bound enzymes that are found in the endoplasmic reticulum of cells (Tukey & Strassburg, 2000).
Glucuronidation is a process that involves the conjugation of glucuronic acid with a substrate, resulting in the formation of a glucuronide (Yang et al., 2017). This process is essential for the detoxification of various compounds, including drugs, toxins, and endogenous substances (Rowland et al., 2013). UGTs play a critical role in drug metabolism and detoxification by converting lipophilic compounds into more hydrophilic glucuronides, which can be easily eliminated from the body (Rowland et al., 2013).
The activity of UGTs is influenced by various factors, including the expression levels of UGT enzymes, the availability of cofactors, and the presence of efflux transporters (Yang et al., 2017). Efflux transporters are responsible for the transport of glucuronides out of the cell, allowing for their excretion (Yang et al., 2017). The expression of UGT enzymes can be regulated by various factors, including age, tissue type, and sex (Naseer et al., 2023). For example, the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B10-like gene was found to be significantly expressed in sclerotized adults, suggesting its role in detoxification (Naseer et al., 2023).
In addition to UGTs, the gut microbiota also plays a role in detoxification. The gut microbiota can metabolize various compounds, including drugs and toxins, into less toxic or inactive forms (Hiura et al., 2013). This process can affect the bioavailability and toxicity of these compounds (Hiura et al., 2013). Furthermore, the gut microbiota can also influence the expression and activity of UGT enzymes (Hiura et al., 2013). For example, certain flavonoids present in the diet can regulate the expression of UGT1A1, an important UGT enzyme involved in the detoxification of bilirubin and other xenobiotics (Hiura et al., 2013).
In conclusion, glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) play a crucial role in detoxification by catalyzing the glucuronidation of compounds. They convert lipophilic compounds into more hydrophilic glucuronides, which can be easily eliminated from the body. The activity of UGTs is influenced by various factors, including the expression levels of UGT enzymes, the availability of cofactors, and the presence of efflux transporters. The gut microbiota also plays a role in detoxification by metabolizing compounds into less toxic or inactive forms and influencing the expression and activity of UGT enzymes. Understanding the role of UGTs, glycoimmunology, and the gut microbiota in detoxification is essential for developing strategies to enhance detoxification processes and improve overall health.
The Role of Glycoimmunology and Cytochrome P450 in Detoxification in Humans
Detoxification is a crucial process in the human body that involves the elimination of harmful substances, such as drugs, toxins, and xenobiotics. Two key players in this process are glycoimmunology and cytochrome P450 enzymes. Glycoimmunology refers to the study of the interactions between glycans (sugar molecules) and the immune system, while cytochrome P450 enzymes are a family of heme-containing monooxygenases involved in the metabolism and detoxification of foreign components (Ahalawat & Mondal, 2018).
Role of Cytochrome P450 in Detoxification
Cytochrome P450 enzymes play a vital role in the detoxification of various substances in the human body. These enzymes catalyze the hydroxylation reactions of a wide range of organic substrates, including drugs, toxins, and xenobiotics (Ahalawat & Mondal, 2018). They are primarily expressed in organs such as the liver, where they contribute to the metabolism and elimination of these substances. The detoxification process involves the conversion of lipophilic compounds into more hydrophilic forms, facilitating their excretion from the body (Nagano et al., 2003). Studies have shown that cytochrome P450 enzymes are involved in the detoxification of plant secondary compounds, insecticides, and other toxic substances (Cheng et al., 2017; AlJabr et al., 2017; Munster et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2014). The expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes is highly inducible, allowing the body to adapt to the presence of foreign substances and enhance detoxification processes (Cheng et al., 2017).
Role of Glycoimmunology in Detoxification
Glycoimmunology plays a crucial role in the recognition and elimination of harmful substances in the body. Glycans, which are sugar molecules, are present on the surface of cells and play a vital role in immune responses. They can act as recognition signals for immune cells, facilitating the identification and clearance of foreign substances (Chung et al., 2009). Glycans can also modulate the activity of immune cells and regulate the immune response. In the context of detoxification, glycoimmunology is involved in the recognition and clearance of toxins and xenobiotics. The interaction between glycans and immune cells, such as macrophages, helps in the recognition and phagocytosis of these harmful substances (Chung et al., 2009). Additionally, glycosylation can affect the activity and stability of detoxification enzymes, including cytochrome P450 enzymes (Ahalawat & Mondal, 2018). Glycosylation of these enzymes can modulate their catalytic activity and enhance their stability, thereby contributing to the detoxification process.
In conclusion, both glycoimmunology and cytochrome P450 enzymes play crucial roles in the detoxification process in humans. Cytochrome P450 enzymes are responsible for the metabolism and elimination of various toxic substances, while glycoimmunology is involved in the recognition and clearance of these substances. The interaction between glycans and immune cells helps in the recognition and phagocytosis of harmful substances, while glycosylation of detoxification enzymes can modulate their activity and stability. Understanding the roles of glycoimmunology and cytochrome P450 in detoxification is essential for developing strategies to enhance the body's ability to eliminate harmful substances and protect against toxic exposures.
The Role of Glycoimmunology, Mannose Metabolism, and Phagocytosis in Detoxification in Humans
Detoxification is a crucial process in the human body that involves the removal of harmful substances and toxins. This process is facilitated by various mechanisms, including glycoimmunology, mannose metabolism, and phagocytosis. Glycoimmunology refers to the study of the interactions between glycans (carbohydrates) and the immune system, while mannose metabolism involves the processing of mannose, a monosaccharide, in the body. Phagocytosis, on the other hand, is the process by which cells engulf and eliminate foreign particles or pathogens. This paper aims to explore the role of glycoimmunology, mannose metabolism, and phagocytosis in detoxification in humans.
Role of Glycoimmunology in Detoxification
Glycoimmunology plays a significant role in detoxification by mediating various immune responses. The mannose receptor, a key player in glycoimmunology, is involved in phagocytosis and endocytosis of mannose-rich substances (Ezekowitz et al., 1990). Studies have shown that the mannose receptor is responsible for the phagocytosis of mannose-rich yeast wall derivatives, indicating its role in the detoxification process (Raveh et al., 1998). Additionally, the mannose receptor can mediate the delivery of lipoglycan antigens to T cells, facilitating the presentation of these antigens and enhancing the immune response (Ernst, 1998). Therefore, glycoimmunology, through the mannose receptor and other glycan-immune interactions, contributes to the detoxification process by promoting immune responses against toxins and pathogens.
Mannose Metabolism and Detoxification
Mannose metabolism is essential for detoxification processes in the human body. Mannose is processed through various metabolic pathways, including the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway and the glycolytic pathway (Wang et al., 2021). These pathways generate important metabolites that are involved in detoxification reactions. For example, the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway produces UDP-N-acetylglucosamine, which is a precursor for the synthesis of glycoproteins and glycolipids involved in immune responses (Wang et al., 2021). These glycoproteins and glycolipids play a crucial role in detoxification by facilitating the recognition and elimination of toxins and pathogens.
Phagocytosis and Detoxification
Phagocytosis is a fundamental process in the immune system that contributes to detoxification. It involves the engulfment and elimination of foreign particles, including toxins and pathogens, by specialized cells called phagocytes. Phagocytosis is mediated by various receptors, including the mannose receptor, which recognizes and binds to mannose-rich substances (Ezekowitz et al., 1990). The phagocytic process leads to the internalization and subsequent degradation of the engulfed particles, effectively removing toxins from the body. Furthermore, phagocytosis stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are essential for antimicrobial phagocytosis and detoxification reactions (Salganik, 2001). ROS play a role in the elimination of cancerous and other life-threatening cells through apoptosis, another important detoxification mechanism (Salganik, 2001).
In conclusion, Glycoimmunology, Mannose metabolism, and Phagocytosis are interconnected processes that contribute to detoxification in humans. Glycoimmunology, through the mannose receptor and glycan-immune interactions, promotes immune responses against toxins and pathogens. Mannose metabolism generates metabolites that are involved in detoxification reactions and immune responses. Phagocytosis, mediated by receptors such as the mannose receptor, facilitates the elimination of toxins and pathogens from the body. These processes work together to ensure the effective detoxification of harmful substances, maintaining the overall health and well-being of individuals.
The Role of Glycoimmunology, Mannose Metabolism, and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Detoxification
Glycoimmunology, mannose metabolism, and the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) have been identified as key players in the detoxification process.
Glycoimmunology and Detoxification
Glycoimmunology refers to the study of the interactions between glycans (carbohydrate molecules) and the immune system. Glycans play a vital role in immune responses, including detoxification processes. Glycan structures on cell surfaces can act as recognition signals for immune cells, facilitating the clearance of toxins and pathogens (Pilz et al., 2015). For example, glycosylation of antibodies can enhance their binding affinity to toxins, promoting their neutralization and elimination (Pilz et al., 2015). Additionally, glycosylation of detoxification enzymes, such as cytochrome P450, can modulate their activity and stability, influencing the efficiency of detoxification processes (Pilz et al., 2015).
Mannose Metabolism and Detoxification
Mannose metabolism is another important aspect of detoxification. Mannose is a monosaccharide that serves as a precursor for the synthesis of glycoproteins and glycolipids involved in immune responses. Mannose metabolism pathways, such as the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), play a critical role in providing energy and reducing power (NADPH) for detoxification processes (Jiang et al., 2014). NADPH is essential for the function of detoxification enzymes, including cytochrome P450, which catalyzes the biotransformation of xenobiotics (Jiang et al., 2014). Moreover, the PPP generates ribose-5-phosphate, a precursor for nucleotide synthesis, which is crucial for cellular proliferation and DNA repair during detoxification processes (Jiang et al., 2014).
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) and Detoxification
The AhR is a ligand-activated transcription factor that plays a central role in detoxification processes. It is activated by various small molecules derived from the diet, microorganisms, metabolism, and pollutants (Gutiérrez-Vázquez & Quintana, 2018). Upon activation, AhR translocates to the nucleus and regulates the expression of genes involved in detoxification, including cytochrome P450 enzymes (Gutiérrez-Vázquez & Quintana, 2018). AhR also interacts with other signaling pathways, such as the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway, which further enhances the detoxification response (Gutiérrez-Vázquez & Quintana, 2018). Studies have shown that AhR-deficient mice exhibit impaired detoxification capacity, highlighting the crucial role of AhR in the elimination of environmental toxins (Gutiérrez-Vázquez & Quintana, 2018).
In conclusion, Glycoimmunology, Mannose Metabolism, and the AhR are interconnected factors that contribute to the detoxification process. Glycans modulate immune responses and enhance the clearance of toxins, while mannose metabolism provides energy and reducing power for detoxification processes. The AhR acts as a transcription factor, regulating the expression of detoxification enzymes and coordinating the detoxification response. Understanding the role of these factors in detoxification can provide insights into the development of therapeutic strategies for detoxification-related disorders.
N-Linked Glycosylation and Detoxification
N-linked glycosylation plays a crucial role in various biological processes, including human detoxification. It involves the addition of glycans to the nitrogen group of asparagine residues (Bozkurt et al., 2021). This post-translational modification has been shown to significantly impact protein stability, activity, and function (Lee et al., 2017). In the context of human detoxification, N-linked glycosylation has been implicated in the transport and metabolism of xenobiotics, such as mycotoxins Berthiller et al. (2012) and fungal cellobiohydrolases (Adney et al., 2009).
One study demonstrated that the carriers responsible for transporting glycosylated, malonylated, and glutathionylated xenobiotics to the tonoplast or plasma membrane are likely different (Berthiller et al., 2012). This suggests that N-linked glycosylation may play a role in the detoxification and elimination of these compounds. Additionally, N-linked glycosylation has been shown to be important for the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases, which are enzymes involved in the degradation of cellulose (Adney et al., 2009). The study found that the secretion and stability of these enzymes were influenced by N-linked glycosylation.
Furthermore, N-linked glycosylation has been implicated in the binding of peptide hormones to receptors. A study on the human calcitonin receptor revealed that N-glycosylation of a specific asparagine residue in the extracellular domain significantly increased the affinity of the receptor for the peptide hormone (Lee et al., 2017). This highlights the importance of N-linked glycosylation in the regulation of hormone signaling and potentially in the detoxification of peptide hormones.
It is worth noting that defects in glycosylation can lead to various genetic disorders. Over 100 human genetic disorders have been attributed to mutations in glycosylation-related genes (Freeze et al., 2014). These disorders, known as congenital disorders of glycosylation, can affect multiple physiological processes and result in a wide range of clinical manifestations (Hennet & Cabalzar, 2015). Understanding the role of glycosylation in human detoxification may provide insights into the pathogenesis of these disorders and potential therapeutic strategies.
In summary, N-linked glycosylation plays a significant role in human detoxification. It is involved in the transport and metabolism of xenobiotics, the stability and activity of enzymes, and the binding of peptide hormones to receptors. Defects in glycosylation can lead to genetic disorders with diverse clinical manifestations. Further research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms by which N-linked glycosylation contributes to human detoxification and to explore its potential therapeutic applications.
The Role of Mannose Metabolism and Methylation in Human Detoxification
Mannose, a simple sugar, plays a crucial role in human metabolism through glycosylation of proteins (Nunzio et al., 2021). It is involved in normal physiology and pathophysiology, and its metabolism is not yet fully understood (Lieu et al., 2021). However, there is evidence to suggest that mannose metabolism is important for human detoxification.
One aspect of mannose metabolism that is relevant to detoxification is its involvement in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). The PPP is a metabolic pathway that generates NADPH, which is essential for detoxification of reactive oxygen species and reductive biosynthesis (Jiang et al., 2014). NADPH is also required for ribose biogenesis, which is important for DNA and RNA synthesis (Jiang et al., 2014). Therefore, mannose metabolism, through its contribution to the PPP, provides the necessary resources for detoxification processes in human cells.
In addition to its role in the PPP, mannose metabolism has been implicated in the detoxification of arsenic. Arsenic is a toxic metalloid that can be found in the environment and can contaminate food and water sources (Kumagai & Sumi, 2007). The methylation of inorganic arsenic has long been considered a detoxification process (Kumagai & Sumi, 2007). However, recent studies have shown that trivalent methylated arsenicals, which are intermediate products of arsenic methylation, are actually more toxic than inorganic arsenic (Sumi & Himeno, 2012). This calls into question whether methylation is truly a detoxification process or if it actually increases toxicity (Qin et al., 2006). Nonetheless, the capacity of cells to produce methylated metabolites is an important aspect of arsenic detoxification (Stýblo et al., 2000).
Furthermore, D-mannose has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects, including the induction of regulatory T cells and the suppression of immunopathology (Zhang et al., 2017). These findings suggest that mannose metabolism may play a role in modulating immune responses and potentially contribute to detoxification processes in the immune system.
In conclusion, mannose metabolism is involved in various aspects of human detoxification. It contributes to the PPP, providing the necessary resources for detoxification processes in cells. It is also implicated in the detoxification of arsenic, although the exact role of methylation in this process is still under investigation. Additionally, mannose has immunomodulatory effects that may be relevant to detoxification in the immune system. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of mannose metabolism and methylation in human detoxification.
The Role of Pentose Phosphate Pathway and MTHFR in Human Detoxification
The pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) play crucial roles in human detoxification processes. The PPP is a metabolic pathway that branches off from glycolysis and is involved in the synthesis of ribonucleotides and the generation of NADPH, which is essential for cellular redox homeostasis and detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Patra & Hay, 2014). The PPP also serves as an antioxidant defense system, providing reducing potential for the detoxification of ROS (Anastasiou et al., 2011). It has been shown that inhibition of pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) by ROS diverts glucose flux into the PPP, enabling the generation of sufficient reducing potential for ROS detoxification (Anastasiou et al., 2011).
MTHFR is an enzyme that plays a key role in folate metabolism and the methylation cycle. It catalyzes the conversion of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, which is the primary circulating form of folate and a key methyl donor in various cellular processes (Mandas et al., 2009). MTHFR polymorphisms have been associated with altered detoxification capacity and increased susceptibility to various diseases, including cancer (Mandas et al., 2009). The MTHFR enzyme is involved in the detoxification of environmental pollutants and xenobiotics through the methylation of toxic compounds (David et al., 2013). Additionally, MTHFR polymorphisms have been linked to increased oxidative stress and impaired antioxidant defense mechanisms (Mandas et al., 2009).
The interplay between the PPP and MTHFR in human detoxification is complex and multifaceted. The PPP provides the reducing potential necessary for detoxification processes, while MTHFR contributes to the methylation of toxic compounds and maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis. Together, these pathways play crucial roles in protecting cells from oxidative damage and maintaining overall detoxification capacity.
The Role of Epigenetics and Glycoimmunology with Human Detoxification
Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene expression that do not involve changes to the underlying DNA sequence (Guo et al., 2019). It has been established that epigenetic alterations play a fundamental role in various biological processes, including aging, cancer, and environmental stress responses (Guo et al., 2019; Jones & Baylin, 2002; Kishimoto et al., 2018). Additionally, epigenetic mechanisms have been implicated in detoxification processes in both plants and humans (Markus et al., 2017; Zhu, 2002).
One area where the relationship between epigenetics and detoxification is particularly relevant is in glycoimmunology. Glycoimmunology is the study of the role of glycans in immune system function (Markus et al., 2017). Glycans are complex sugar molecules that are attached to proteins and lipids on the cell surface. They play a crucial role in immune cell recognition and signaling (Markus et al., 2017). Epigenetic alterations have been shown to regulate the expression of genes involved in glycan synthesis and immune cell function (Markus et al., 2017). For example, in the context of herbicide resistance in weeds, epigenetic modifications were found to activate specific genes responsible for detoxification of herbicides, including genes involved in glycan synthesis (Markus et al., 2017). This suggests that epigenetic regulation of glycan-related genes may play a role in detoxification processes in humans as well.
Furthermore, epigenetic alterations have been implicated in the regulation of detoxification pathways in response to environmental stressors. Osmotic stress, for example, has been shown to activate protein kinases that mediate detoxification responses in plants (Zhu, 2002). Similarly, exposure to cigarette smoke has been found to induce epigenetic alterations that affect smoking-mediated inflammatory responses (Zong et al., 2019). These findings suggest that epigenetic mechanisms may play a role in the regulation of detoxification pathways in response to various environmental stressors in humans as well.
In addition to the role of epigenetics in detoxification, there is also evidence to suggest that epigenetic alterations may contribute to the development of diseases such as cancer. Epigenetic events, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, have been shown to modulate gene transcription and play a fundamental role in the initiation and progression of human cancer (Jones & Baylin, 2002). Furthermore, there is growing interest in the potential link between environmental chemical exposures and altered epigenetics (Issa, 2014). This suggests that epigenetic alterations resulting from exposure to environmental toxins may contribute to the dysregulation of detoxification pathways and increase the risk of developing diseases such as cancer.
In conclusion, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the relationship between epigenetics and glycoimmunology with human detoxification. Epigenetic alterations have been shown to regulate the expression of genes involved in glycan synthesis and immune cell function, suggesting a role in detoxification processes. Additionally, epigenetic mechanisms have been implicated in the regulation of detoxification pathways in response to environmental stressors. Furthermore, epigenetic alterations have been implicated in the development of diseases such as cancer, which may involve dysregulation of detoxification pathways. Further research is needed to fully understand the complex interplay between epigenetics, glycoimmunology, and human detoxification.
References:
Bowatte, G., Lodge, C., Perret, J., Matheson, M., & Dharmage, S. (2016). Interactions of gst polymorphisms in air pollution exposure and respiratory diseases and allergies. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-016-0664-z
Colomb, F., Giron, L., Trbojević-Akmačić, I., Lauc, G., & Abdel-Mohsen, M. (2019). Breaking the glyco-code of hiv persistence and immunopathogenesis. Current Hiv/Aids Reports, 16(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-019-00433-w
Jun, Z., Xu, L., Sun, Y., Song, P., & Han, Z. (2019). Udp-glycosyltransferase genes in the striped rice stem borer, chilo suppressalis (walker), and their contribution to chlorantraniliprole resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(5), 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051064
DeRossi, C., Bambino, K., Morrison, J., Sakarin, I., Villacorta-Martin, C., Zhang, C., … & Chu, J. (2019). Mannose phosphate isomerase and mannose regulate hepatic stellate cell activation and fibrosis in zebrafish and humans. Hepatology, 70(6), 2107-2122. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30677
Sha, J., Cao, D., Cui, R., Lu, X., Hua, X., Lu, Y., … & Han, S. (2020). <p>mannose impairs lung adenocarcinoma growth and enhances the sensitivity of a549 cells to carboplatin</p>. Cancer Management and Research, Volume 12, 11077-11083. https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s278673
Sharma, V., Ichikawa, M., & Freeze, H. (2014). Mannose metabolism: more than meets the eye. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 453(2), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.06.021
Sharma, V., Smolin, J., Nayak, J., Ayala, J., Scott, D., Peterson, S., … & Freeze, H. (2018). Mannose alters gut microbiome, prevents diet-induced obesity, and improves host metabolism. Cell Reports, 24(12), 3087-3098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.064
Yan, X., Huang, Y., Song, H., Chen, F., Geng, Q., Hu, M., … & Cao, S. (2021). A myb4-man3-mannose-mnb1 signaling cascade regulates cadmium tolerance in arabidopsis. Plos Genetics, 17(6), e1009636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009636
Carmona-Gutiérrez, D., Hughes, A., Madeo, F., & Ruckenstuhl, C. (2016). The crucial impact of lysosomes in aging and longevity. Ageing Research Reviews, 32, 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.04.009
Dielschneider, R., Henson, E., & Gibson, S. (2017). Lysosomes as oxidative targets for cancer therapy. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2017, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3749157
Ferguson, S. (2019). Neuronal lysosomes. Neuroscience Letters, 697, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.04.005
Guerra, F., Paiano, A., Migoni, D., Girolimetti, G., Perrone, A., Iaco, P., … & Bucci, C. (2019). Modulation of rab7a protein expression determines resistance to cisplatin through late endocytic pathway impairment and extracellular vesicular secretion. Cancers, 11(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010052
Mindell, J. (2012). Lysosomal acidification mechanisms. Annual Review of Physiology, 74(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142317
Settembre, C., Fraldi, A., Medina, D., & Ballabio, A. (2013). Signals from the lysosome: a control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 14(5), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3565
Singh, S., Trikha, S., Sarkar, A., & Jeremic, A. (2016). Proteasome regulates turnover of toxic human amylin in pancreatic cells. Biochemical Journal, 473(17), 2655-2670. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20160026
Wu, P., Hwang, K., Lan, T., & Lu, Y. (2013). A dnazyme-gold nanoparticle probe for uranyl ion in living cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135(14), 5254-5257. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja400150v
Ahearn, G., Mandal, P., & Mandal, A. (2004). Mechanisms of heavy-metal sequestration and detoxification in crustaceans: a review. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 174(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-004-0438-0
Babst, M. (1997). Endosomal transport function in yeast requires a novel aaa-type atpase, vps4p. The Embo Journal, 16(8), 1820-1831. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.8.1820
Berry, J., Zhang, L., Galle, P., Ansoborlo, E., Henge-Napoli, M., & Donnadieu-Claraz, M. (1997). Role of alveolar macrophage lysosomes in metal detoxification. Microscopy Research and Technique, 36(4), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0029(19970215)36:43.0.co;2-m
Bohnsack, R., Song, X., Olson, L., Kudo, M., Gotschall, R., Canfield, W., … & Dahms, N. (2009). Cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284(50), 35215-35226. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m109.056184
Boutouja, F., Stiehm, C., Mastalski, T., Brinkmeier, R., Reidick, C., Magraoui, F., … & Platta, H. (2019). Vps10-mediated targeting of pep4 determines the activity of the vacuole in a substrate-dependent manner. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47184-7
Das, S., Parekh, N., Mondal, B., & Gupta, S. (2016). Controlled synthesis of end-functionalized mannose-6-phosphate glycopolypeptides for lysosome targeting. Acs Macro Letters, 5(7), 809-813. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00297
Waguri, S., Dewitte, F., Borgne, R., Rouillé, Y., Uchiyama, Y., Dubremetz, J., … & Hoflack, B. (2003). Visualization of tgn to endosome trafficking through fluorescently labeled mpr and ap-1 in living cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 14(1), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-06-0338
Zhu, J., Lu, K., Zhang, C., Liang, J., & Hu, Z. (2011). Biochemical and ultrastructural changes in the hepatopancreas ofbellamya aeruginosa(gastropoda) fed with toxic cyanobacteria. The Scientific World Journal, 11, 2091-2105. https://doi.org/10.1100/2011/402326
Küpper, A., Peter, F., Zöllner, P., Lorentz, L., Tranel, P., Beffa, R., … & Gaines, T. (2018). Tembotrione detoxification in 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (hppd) inhibitor-resistant palmer amaranth (amaranthus palmeris. wats.). Pest Management Science, 74(10), 2325-2334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4786
Mariniello, M., Petruzzelli, R., Wanderlingh, L., Montagna, R., Carissimo, A., Pane, F., … & Polishchuk, R. (2020). Synthetic lethality screening identifies fda-approved drugs that overcome atp7b-mediated tolerance of tumor cells to cisplatin. Cancers, 12(3), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030608
Song, X., Narzt, M., Nagelreiter, I., Hohensinner, P., Terlecki-Zaniewicz, L., Tschachler, E., … & Gruber, F. (2017). Autophagy deficient keratinocytes display increased dna damage, senescence and aberrant lipid composition after oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo. Redox Biology, 11, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.015
Zhang, L., Li, C., Fu, L., Yu, Z., Xu, G., Zhou, J., … & Zhou, X. (2022). Protection of catalpol against triptolide-induced hepatotoxicity by inhibiting excessive autophagy via the perk-atf4-chop pathway. Peerj, 10, e12759. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12759
Asher, G., Dym, O., Tsvetkov, P., Adler, J., & Shaul, Y. (2006). The crystal structure of nad(p)h quinone oxidoreductase 1 in complex with its potent inhibitor dicoumarol. Biochemistry, 45(20), 6372-6378. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0600087
Karimi-Moghadam, A., Charsouei, S., Bell, B., & Jabalameli, M. (2018). Parkinson disease from mendelian forms to genetic susceptibility: new molecular insights into the neurodegeneration process. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 38(6), 1153-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-018-0587-4
Rangasamy, T., Misra, V., Zhen, L., Tankersley, C., Tuder, R., & Biswal, S. (2009). Cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in a/j mice is associated with pulmonary oxidative stress, apoptosis of lung cells, and global alterations in gene expression. Ajp Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 296(6), L888-L900. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.90369.2008
Sankaranarayanan, S., Jamshed, M., Abhinandan, K., Skori, L., Scandola, S., Wang, T., … & Samuel, M. (2017). Glyoxalase goes green: the expanding roles of glyoxalase in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(4), 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040898
Singh, S., Trikha, S., Sarkar, A., & Jeremic, A. (2016). Proteasome regulates turnover of toxic human amylin in pancreatic cells. Biochemical Journal, 473(17), 2655-2670. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20160026
Cuadrado, A., Rojo, A., Wells, G., Hayes, J., Cousin, S., Rumsey, W., … & Dinkova‐Kostova, A. (2019). Therapeutic targeting of the nrf2 and keap1 partnership in chronic diseases. Nature Reviews Cancer, 18(4), 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-018-0008-x
DeNicola, G., Karreth, F., Humpton, T., Gopinathan, A., Wei, C., Frese, K., … & Tuveson, D. (2011). Oncogene-induced nrf2 transcription promotes ros detoxification and tumorigenesis. Nature, 475(7354), 106-109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10189
Kim, J., Kang, D., Cho, Y., Hyun, J., & Ahn, M. (2022). Medicarpin increases antioxidant genes by inducing nrf2 transcriptional level in hela cells. Antioxidants, 11(2), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020421
Kitamura, H. and Motohashi, H. (2018). Nrf2 addiction in cancer cells. Cancer Science, 109(4), 900-911. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13537
Singh, A., Boldin-Adamsky, S., Thimmulappa, R., Rath, S., Ashush, H., Coulter, J., … & Biswal, S. (2008). rnai-mediated silencing of nuclear factor erythroid-2–related factor 2 gene expression in non–small cell lung cancer inhibits tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy. Cancer Research, 68(19), 7975-7984. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1401
Singh, A., Misra, V., Thimmulappa, R., Lee, H., Ames, S., Hoque, M., … & Biswal, S. (2006). Dysfunctional keap1–nrf2 interaction in non-small-cell lung cancer. Plos Medicine, 3(10), e420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030420
Taguchi, K., Motohashi, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2011). Molecular mechanisms of the keap1-nrf2 pathway in stress response and cancer evolution. Genes to Cells, 16(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01473.x
Afzal, S., Raju, R., Or, K., & Muench, G. (2022). Identification of nrf2 activators from the roots of valeriana officinalis. Planta Medica, 89(01), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1887-2016
Bataille, A. and Manautou, J. (2012). Nrf2: a potential target for new therapeutics in liver disease. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 92(3), 340-348. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2012.110
DeNicola, G., Karreth, F., Humpton, T., Gopinathan, A., Wei, C., Frese, K., … & Tuveson, D. (2011). Oncogene-induced nrf2 transcription promotes ros detoxification and tumorigenesis. Nature, 475(7354), 106-109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10189
Okazaki, K., Papagiannakopoulos, T., & Motohashi, H. (2020). Metabolic features of cancer cells in nrf2 addiction status. Biophysical Reviews, 12(2), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00659-8
Taguchi, K., Motohashi, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2011). Molecular mechanisms of the keap1-nrf2 pathway in stress response and cancer evolution. Genes to Cells, 16(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01473.x
Zeng, Z., Li, C., Liu, Y., Hui, C., & Feng, X. (2023). Delivery of transcriptional factors for activating antioxidant defenses against inflammatory bowel disease. Acs Applied Bio Materials, 6(3), 1306-1312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.3c00094
Nicolis, E., Pasetto, M., Cigana, C., Pradal, U., Assael, B., & Melotti, P. (2006). The gcc repeat length in the 5'utr of mrp1 gene is polymorphic: a functional characterization of its relevance for cystic fibrosis. BMC Medical Genetics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-7-7
Patergnani, S., Vitto, V., Pinton, P., & Rimessi, A. (2020). Mitochondrial stress responses and “mito-inflammation” in cystic fibrosis. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.581114
Schmitz, G. and Langmann, T. (2008). Human abc transporters: function, expression, and regulation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527610754.mp11
Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Stoven, V., Annereau, J., Witko-Sarsat, V., Reinert, P., Guyot, M., … & Lenoir, G. (1999). Interest of colchicine for the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients. preliminary report. Mediators of Inflammation, 8(1), 13-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09629359990667
Wioland, M., Fleury-Feith, J., Corlieu, P., Commo, F., Monceaux, G., Lacau-St-Guily, J., … & Bernaudin, J. (2000). Cftr, mdr1, and mrp1 immunolocalization in normal human nasal respiratory mucosa. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 48(9), 1215-1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215540004800905
Xi, Z., Pan, A., Ashrafi, Z., Woods, K., Hessner, M., Simpson, P., … & Levy, H. (2017). Increased expression of plasma-induced abcc1 mrna in cystic fibrosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(8), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081752
Li, X., Schuler, M., & Berenbaum, M. (2007). Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annual Review of Entomology, 52(1), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151104
Marrs, K. (1996). The functions and regulation of glutathione s-transferases in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 47(1), 127-158. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.127
Hiura, Y., Satsu, H., Hamada, M., & Shimizu, M. (2013). Analysis of flavonoids regulating the expression of ugt1a1viaxenobiotic receptors in intestinal epithelial cells. Biofactors, 40(3), 336-345. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1153
Naseer, A., Mogilicherla, K., Sellamuthu, G., & Roy, A. (2023). Age matters: life-stage, tissue, and sex-specific gene expression dynamics in ips typographus (coleoptera: curculionidae: scolytinae). Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1124754
Rowland, A., Miners, J., & Mackenzie, P. (2013). The udp-glucuronosyltransferases: their role in drug metabolism and detoxification. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 45(6), 1121-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2013.02.019
Tukey, R. and Strassburg, C. (2000). Human udp-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease. The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 40(1), 581-616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.581
Yang, G., Ge, S., Singh, R., Basu, S., Shatzer, K., Zen, M., … & Hu, M. (2017). Glucuronidation: driving factors and their impact on glucuronide disposition. Drug Metabolism Reviews, 49(2), 105-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2017.1293682
Ahalawat, N. and Mondal, J. (2018). Mapping the substrate recognition pathway in cytochrome p450.. https://doi.org/10.1101/416305
AlJabr, A., Hussain, A., Rizwan-ul-Haq, M., & Al-Ayedh, H. (2017). Toxicity of plant secondary metabolites modulating detoxification genes expression for natural red palm weevil pesticide development. Molecules, 22(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010169
Cheng, T., Wu, J., Wu, Y., Chilukuri, R., Huang, L., Yamamoto, K., … & Mita, K. (2017). Genomic adaptation to polyphagy and insecticides in a major east asian noctuid pest. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(11), 1747-1756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0314-4
Chung, H., Sztal, T., Pasricha, S., Sridhar, M., Batterham, P., & Daborn, P. (2009). Characterization of drosophila melanogaster cytochrome p450 genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(14), 5731-5736. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812141106
Munster, M., Préfontaine, G., Meunier, L., Elias, M., Mazza, A., Brousseau, R., … & Masson, L. (2007). Altered gene expression in choristoneura fumiferana and manduca sexta in response to sublethal intoxication by bacillus thuringiensis cry1ab toxin. Insect Molecular Biology, 16(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00692.x
Nagano, S., Li, H., Shimizu, H., Nishida, C., Ogura, H., Montellano, P., … & Poulos, T. (2003). Crystal structures of epothilone d-bound, epothilone b-bound, and substrate-free forms of cytochrome p450epok. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(45), 44886-44893. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m308115200
Sun, L., Wang, Z., Zou, C., & Cao, C. (2014). Transcription profiling of 12 asian gypsy moth (lymantria dispar) cytochrome p450 genes in response to insecticides. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 85(4), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21152
Ernst, J. (1998). Macrophage receptors formycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity, 66(4), 1277-1281. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.66.4.1277-1281.1998
Ezekowitz, R., Sastry, K., Bailly, P., & Warner, A. (1990). Molecular characterization of the human macrophage mannose receptor: demonstration of multiple carbohydrate recognition-like domains and phagocytosis of yeasts in cos-1 cells.. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 172(6), 1785-1794. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.172.6.1785
Raveh, D., Kruskal, B., Farland, J., & Ezekowitz, R. (1998). Th1 and th2 cytokines cooperate to stimulate mannose-receptor-mediated phagocytosis. Journal of Leukocyte Biology, 64(1), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.64.1.108
Salganik, R. (2001). The benefits and hazards of antioxidants: controlling apoptosis and other protective mechanisms in cancer patients and the human population. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 20(sup5), 464S-472S. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2001.10719185
Wang, M., Zhao, S., Thapa, D., Song, Y., & Xiang, Z. (2021). Metabolomics of fuzi-gancao in ccl4 induced acute liver injury and its regulatory effect on bile acid profile in rats. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 27(40), 6888-6907. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i40.6888
Gutiérrez-Vázquez, C. and Quintana, F. (2018). Regulation of the immune response by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Immunity, 48(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.12.012
Jiang, P., Du, W., & Wu, M. (2014). Regulation of the pentose phosphate pathway in cancer. Protein & Cell, 5(8), 592-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-014-0082-8
Pilz, A., Feyerabend, T., Sonner, J., Redaelli, C., Peter, K., Kunze, A., … & Platten, M. (2015). Normal mast cell numbers in the tissues of ahr‐deficient mice. Experimental Dermatology, 25(1), 62-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12864
Adney, W., Jeoh, T., Beckham, G., Chou, Y., Baker, J., Michener, W., … & Himmel, M. (2009). Probing the role of n-linked glycans in the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases by mutational analysis. Cellulose, 16(4), 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9305-1
Berthiller, F., Crews, C., Dall’Asta, C., Saeger, S., Haesaert, G., Karlovský, P., … & Stroka, J. (2012). Masked mycotoxins: a review. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 57(1), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201100764
Bozkurt, E., Cagil, I., Kehribar, E., Işılak, M., & Seker, U. (2021). Protein engineering with a glycosylation circuit enables improved enzyme characteristics.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.15.468597
Freeze, H., Chong, J., Bamshad, M., & Ng, B. (2014). Solving glycosylation disorders: fundamental approaches reveal complicated pathways. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 94(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.024
Hennet, T. and Cabalzar, J. (2015). Congenital disorders of glycosylation: a concise chart of glycocalyx dysfunction. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 40(7), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.03.002
Lee, S., Booe, J., Gingell, J., Sjoelund, V., Hay, D., & Pioszak, A. (2017). N-glycosylation of asparagine 130 in the extracellular domain of the human calcitonin receptor significantly increases peptide hormone affinity. Biochemistry, 56(26), 3380-3393. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00256
Jiang, P., Du, W., & Wu, M. (2014). Regulation of the pentose phosphate pathway in cancer. Protein & Cell, 5(8), 592-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-014-0082-8
Kumagai, Y. and Sumi, D. (2007). Arsenic: signal transduction, transcription factor, and biotransformation involved in cellular response and toxicity. The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 47(1), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.47.120505.105144
Lieu, E., Kelekar, N., Bhalla, P., & Kim, J. (2021). Fructose and mannose in inborn errors of metabolism and cancer. Metabolites, 11(8), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11080479
Nunzio, C., Bartoletti, R., Tubaro, A., Simonato, A., & Ficarra, V. (2021). Role of d-mannose in the prevention of recurrent uncomplicated cystitis: state of the art and future perspectives. Antibiotics, 10(4), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040373
Qin, J., Rosen, B., Zhang, Y., Wang, G., Franke, S., & Rensing, C. (2006). Arsenic detoxification and evolution of trimethylarsine gas by a microbial arsenite s-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(7), 2075-2080. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506836103
Stýblo, M., Razo, L., Vega, L., Germolec, D., LeCluyse, E., Hamilton, G., … & Thomas, D. (2000). Comparative toxicity of trivalent and pentavalent inorganic and methylated arsenicals in rat and human cells. Archives of Toxicology, 74(6), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002040000134
Sumi, D. and Himeno, S. (2012). Role of arsenic (+3 oxidation state) methyltransferase in arsenic metabolism and toxicity. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 35(11), 1870-1875. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b212015
Zhang, D., Chia, C., Jin, X., Jin, W., Kasagi, S., Wu, R., … & Chen, W. (2017). D-mannose induces regulatory t cells and suppresses immunopathology. Nature Medicine, 23(9), 1036-1045. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4375
Anastasiou, D., Poulogiannis, G., Asara, J., Boxer, M., Jiang, J., Shen, M., … & Cantley, L. (2011). Inhibition of pyruvate kinase m2 by reactive oxygen species contributes to cellular antioxidant responses. Science, 334(6060), 1278-1283. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211485
David, J., Ismail, H., Chandor-Proust, A., & Paine, M. (2013). Role of cytochrome p450s in insecticide resistance: impact on the control of mosquito-borne diseases and use of insecticides on earth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 368(1612), 20120429. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0429
Mandas, A., Peiretti, E., Cocco, P., Norfo, C., Abete, C., Angius, F., … & Fossarello, M. (2009). Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase deficiency as a risk factor in proliferative disorder development. Nature Precedings. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3001.1
Patra, K. and Hay, N. (2014). The pentose phosphate pathway and cancer. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 39(8), 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.06.005
Guo, X., Dong, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019). Epigenetics recording varied environment and complex cell events represents the origin of cellular aging. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 20(7), 550-562. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b1800507
Issa, J. (2014). Aging and epigenetic drift: a vicious cycle. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 124(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci69735
Jones, P. and Baylin, S. (2002). The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(6), 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg816
Kishimoto, S., Uno, M., & Nishida, E. (2018). Molecular mechanisms regulating lifespan and environmental stress responses. Inflammation and Regeneration, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-018-0080-y
Markus, C., Pecinka, A., Karan, R., Barney, J., & Merotto, A. (2017). Epigenetic regulation – contribution to herbicide resistance in weeds?. Pest Management Science, 74(2), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4727
Zhu, J. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 53(1), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329
Zong, D., Liu, X., Li, J., Ouyang, R., & Chen, P. (2019). The role of cigarette smoke-induced epigenetic alterations in inflammation. Epigenetics & Chromatin, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0311-8
Comments